Halting the Infinite Regress: Why Every System Needs Its Own Transcendental Signified

Introduction: Toward a Plurality of Foundations The idea that systems of thought operate according to internal principles has profound implications for how we approach truth, meaning, and the very structure of knowledge. Derrida’s critique of the transcendental signified —a term he deploys to name the illusory promise of a final, absolute meaning—is among the most influential contributions to 20th-century philosophy. However, if we are to take seriously the Saussurean insight that meaning arises only within a system of differences, then Derrida's own critique must also be considered as internal to the system of deconstruction. This article proposes a measured approach: rather than accepting différance as a metaphysical absolute, we should treat it as a system-relative insight, comparable to the foundational principles of Euclidean geometry or the transcendentals of medieval thought. By putting Derrida in dialogue with Euclid, Plato, scholastic philosophers and Saussure, we argue...