Posts

Why Is Adorno So Difficult? Language, Concepts, and Non-Identity

Image
1. The Problem of Difficult Philosophy Why would a philosophy concerned with society and its transformation make itself so difficult to read? Bryan Magee put this question to Herbert Marcuse in an interview about the Frankfurt School. Magee acknowledged the intellectual stature of its members, but objected that much of their writing was extraordinarily difficult, sometimes to the point of seeming unintelligible. He singled out Theodor W. Adorno, whom Marcuse had described as a genius, and observed that some of Adorno's work was literally unreadable. The difficulty seemed particularly striking when compared with traditions such as analytic philosophy and existentialism, whose major writers could be witty, forceful, and accessible to a broad audience. Marcuse partly accepted the criticism. He admitted that there were many things in Adorno that he did not understand. Yet he also offered a justification. Ordinary language, he argued, had become deeply permeated by the established s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reopening the Concept of the Intellectual: Before and After 1968

Image
1. Sartre and the Classic Intellectual What makes someone an intellectual? In A Plea for Intellectuals , Sartre approaches this question by examining the social position from which intellectual intervention becomes possible. The intellectual does not begin as a distinct profession. He emerges from among what Sartre calls the “technicians of practical knowledge”: scientists, teachers, engineers, doctors, lawyers, and others whose work depends on specialized knowledge. Their expertise is directed toward particular tasks, yet it is grounded in methods and forms of knowledge that claim universal validity. The intellectual appears when this relationship between the universal and the particular becomes a problem for the technician himself. Sartre’s example of the scientist working on atomic warfare makes the distinction clear. A scientist who contributes to the development of nuclear weapons remains, in Sartre’s terms, a technician as long as he confines himself to the technical task. Wh...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Knowledge Becomes the Question: Intellectual Authority after 1968

Image
1. The Intellectual and the Universal What gives an intellectual the authority to criticize society? The question becomes easier to approach if we begin with a particular conception of intellectual work: the educated person whose specialized knowledge brings him into contact with questions that extend beyond his immediate field  (Sartre, 1972).  The intellectual occupies a position between specialized knowledge and public life because the practice of a particular profession can reveal problems with wider social significance. Sartre offers a particularly useful formulation of this position. He begins with what he calls the “technicians of practical knowledge”: professors, researchers, engineers, doctors, writers, and others whose professional work involves specialized forms of knowledge. Such a person does not become an intellectual simply by doing this work. The transformation occurs when the practice itself reveals a contradiction between the universal character of the kn...
Post a Comment
Read more