Return to Saussure

Source: Wikipedia Introduction The conversation around AI and education often begins with a familiar accusation: students who use tools like ChatGPT are somehow cheating themselves, producing shallow work, or “learning less.” A recent MIT study has fueled the narrative, suggesting that AI usage diminishes cognitive engagement and recall. On the surface, the conclusion appears straightforward. But beneath the data lies a deeper issue: the debate itself is anchored in an outdated metaphysics of presence. The underlying assumption of this discourse is that intelligence is something wholly present, a possession of the mind, measurable once the tools are removed. In other words, cognition is treated as a book: bounded, stable, and self-contained. AI disrupts this illusion. It does not make students less intelligent. It exposes the obsolescence of a paradigm that still evaluates thought by what can be internalized and recalled. The old measures were never neutral; they were logocentric, ...

  Introduction In Plato’s Apology , Socrates approaches death not with fear but with calm curiosity. He posits that if death is the migration of the soul, it may offer a profound gift: the chance to engage eternally in dialogue with the dead—Orpheus, Musaeus, Hesiod, Homer, Palamedes, Ajax, and others. These figures range from mythic poets to tragic heroes, some historical, others legendary or fictitious. What unites them is their capacity to be questioned. Socrates imagines an afterlife not of silence, but of ceaseless philosophical exchange. In our digital present, a curious parallel emerges: large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, simulate conversations across time. Though unconscious and devoid of true knowledge ( epistēmē ), these systems emulate a space akin to the one Socrates envisioned—an archive of voices awaiting examination. This article proposes that, despite their mechanical origin, AI systems echo the philosophical afterlife of dialogue: a realm where crit...