Return to Saussure

Introduction When American artist William T. Wiley coined the cryptic acronyms M.A.S.U. (“Machines Are Saving Us”) and M.A.K.U. (“Machines Are Killing Us”), he was not simply commenting on technology. He was revealing a deeper paradox at the heart of modern life, the impossibility of separating our tools from ourselves. In Wiley’s ironic phrasing, the machine embodies both hope and threat, salvation and destruction, cure and poison. Today, as artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) transform our creative and intellectual landscape, Wiley’s playful opposition feels uncannily prophetic. His “both/and” vision captures the essence of our contemporary anxiety: the very technologies that extend human thought also risk erasing the distinction between the human and the machinic. In Derrida’s sense, they are pharmaka , remedies that contain their own poison. To understand how Wiley anticipated this moment, we can trace his ideas back to the artistic lineage that first blurr...

Writing Without Origin. AI generated   Introduction: Fault Lines in a Storied Paradigm Noam Chomsky revolutionized modern linguistics by proposing that human language is rooted in a biologically endowed faculty of mind. In his view, language is primarily an internal system for organizing thought, not a tool for communication. The hypothesis of a Language Acquisition Device (LAD), governed by an innate Universal Grammar (UG), positioned human cognition at the center of linguistic creativity and syntactic complexity. Language, Chomsky famously argued, is “a mirror of mind” (Chomsky, 2000, p. 4). Today, however, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini challenge this vision. These systems, devoid of any biological substrate or mental architecture, generate coherent and seemingly intelligent discourse through purely statistical operations. Their success forces us to reassess the foundations of linguistic theory. More provocatively, Chomsky himself has ...