Return to Saussure

“Socrates says three important things with regard to his invitation to others to occupy themselves with themselves: (1) His mission was conferred on him by the gods…(2) For this task he demands no reward… (3) His mission is useful for the city more useful than the Athenians military victory at Olympia - because in teaching people too occupy themselves with themselves, he teaches them to occupy themselves with the city. Eight centuries later, one fi nds the same notion and the same phrase in Gregory of Nyssa’s treatise, On Virginity , but with an entirely different meaning. Gregory did not mean the movement by which one takes care of oneself and the city; he meant the movement by which one renounces the world and marriage and detaches oneself from the fl esh and, with virginity of heart and body, recovers the immortality of which one has been deprived.” — Michel Foucault, Technologies of the Self 1. The Same Words In Technologies of the Self , Michel Foucault draws attention to a ...

The Algorithmic Gaze. AI image   Introduction “Man is the measure of all things.” The phrase, attributed to Protagoras, is often taken as a simple statement of relativism. Yet its scope is wider. It marks a point of departure: a world in which reality cannot be separated from the standpoint of the one who encounters it. What is, appears always for someone. From this starting point, a long transformation unfolds. Across centuries, the locus of measure does not remain fixed. It is challenged, displaced, and reformulated in different ways. What begins as a claim about perception becomes, over time, a question about the ground of knowledge itself. Seen from the present, this trajectory takes on a new shape. From ancient philosophy to contemporary systems of calculation, the issue is no longer how the world is measured, but whether man still occupies that position as the measure of reality. Protagoras and the Human Measure Protagoras’s claim does more than register disagreemen...

gnōthi seautón. AI image Introduction Isaiah Berlin’s essay The Hedgehog and the Fox (1953) opens with a fragment by Archilochus: “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.” From this simple line, Berlin constructs a taxonomy of intellectual temperaments. The hedgehog organizes the world through a single unifying vision; the fox thrives amid diversity, pursuing many unrelated aims. “For there exists a great chasm,” Berlin writes, “between those who relate everything to a single central vision, and those who pursue many ends, often unrelated and even contradictory” ( The Hedgehog and the Fox , p. 3). This opposition—visionary unity versus analytical plurality—offers a striking lens through which to reread the foundations of Western philosophy. Plato’s Socrates, who knew only that he did not know, exemplifies the hedgehog’s single-mindedness. Aristotle, who multiplied the branches of knowledge and coined the names of its disciplines, embodies the fox’s expansi...

Checkmate of Reason. AI art: symbolic expressioninsm Introduction The critique of reason as the gravitational center of Western culture has been developed through multiple genealogies. Jacques Derrida, in Of Grammatology , denounces "logocentrism": a structure of thought that privileges speech over writing, presence over absence, and origin over supplement. But long before Derrida, Friedrich Nietzsche had already sketched a structural critique of the dominance of rationality in the history of art, particularly in The Birth of Tragedy . His diagnosis of Socrates as a symptom of cultural decline and his suspicion of reason as a tyranny disguised as truth anticipate, in different terms, a proto-deconstructive approach. This article explores how Nietzsche and Derrida disarticulate two analogous hierarchical inversions: that of reason over instinct, and that of speech over writing. Socrates as Symptom: Nietzsche's Diagnosis Nietzsche does not view Socrates as a model...