Return to Saussure

Introduction Identity often emerges from the interplay of seemingly opposed forces—male and female, active and passive, reason and desire. In both Plato’s Symposium and Nietzsche’s later writings, the figure of the androgynous serves not as a literal concept of gender, but as a compelling metaphor for inner unity and the complexity of becoming. Although separated by centuries and grounded in divergent metaphysical assumptions, both philosophers explore the integration of opposites as central to self-understanding. This article argues that Plato and Nietzsche, each in his own idiom, envision the human being as divided yet striving—whether for lost wholeness or creative transformation. The Androgynous Myth in Plato’s Symposium In the Symposium , Aristophanes offers a mythic account of love’s origin that locates human desire in an ancient rupture. Originally, he claims, humans came in three types: male-male (from the sun), female-female (from the earth), and androgynous—male an...