Return to Saussure

The Globe. AI image Introduction — Is There Method in the Madness? “Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t.” The line, spoken by Polonius in Hamlet, captures a paradox that extends well beyond the stage. It proves especially suggestive when approaching post-structuralist writing, which often appears, at first encounter, disordered, playful, even erratic. Readers of Jacques Derrida or Michel Foucault frequently describe a sense of instability: meanings shift, arguments double back, and clarity seems continually deferred. This first impression, however, can be misleading. What looks like looseness is often the product of careful construction. These texts are not casual or improvised; they are highly deliberate. The real question, then, is not whether method is present, but why such disciplined procedures are used to produce instability. If meaning cannot settle, why is the reasoning so exact? The Non-Finality Thesis Post-structuralist thought is commonly associated with...

Wilde and Shakespeare in The Globe. AI art Introduction From baby names to brands or corporate logos, from novels to news headlines, people often act as if names carry a hidden charge—a sign of fate, character, or truth. This age-old belief is distilled in the Latin maxim nomen est omen , which translates to “the name is a sign” or more evocatively, “the name is a prophecy.” It suggests that names are not mere labels, but potent clues to the nature or destiny of their bearers. This article explores the roots of nomen est omen and then examines how this notion is treated—and ultimately undermined—in two canonical literary texts: Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest and William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet . Wilde satirizes the performative allure of naming, while Shakespeare poetically denies its power, offering two distinct critiques of the belief that names reveal essence. The Origins of a Belief The phrase nomen est omen can be traced back to Roman literatur...

    Introduction What is a name? Is it a vessel of meaning, bearing the essence of a person or object, or merely a social tag affixed by convention? This enduring question lies at the heart of two iconic literary texts: Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest . While Juliet famously asserts that names are superficial and malleable, Wilde’s characters—especially Gwendolen Fairfax—imbue names with almost mystical significance. These opposing views reflect a philosophical tension between nominalism and essentialism, and they resonate strongly with modern theories of language and identity. Both plays, in their distinct registers, dramatize the fraught relationship between words and the realities they claim to represent. In doing so, they anticipate central concerns of semiotics and linguistic performativity. Juliet and the Logic of Nominalism In Act II, Scene 2 of Romeo and Juliet , Juliet offers one of the most quoted reflectio...