Return to Saussure

The Teacher. AI image   “I’ll give €1000 to anyone who can tell me what a ‘1’ is.” A colleague once made this remark during a teacher training seminar. The context was telling: more than twenty experienced teachers were asked to assess the same student essay using a shared rubric. Despite comparable professional backgrounds and clearly defined criteria, the results varied significantly. Some assigned the top mark, others a “3,” with several gradations in between. Such divergence is often treated as a practical inconvenience, something to be minimized through clearer guidelines or tighter standardization. Yet its persistence suggests a deeper issue. If a grade were a stable property of the text, one would expect far greater agreement. At the same time, few educators would accept that grading is simply arbitrary. This tension points to a more fundamental question: what kind of act is grading? The following argument proposes that marks are not discovered but produced through acts ...

Minimal Pairs. AI art   Introduction: Between Flexibility and Limit The postmodern claim that “all interpretations are equally valid” has had a decisive influence on contemporary philosophy and the social sciences. Its appeal lies in the fact that, at first sight, it reflects common experiences: what feels cold to one person may feel warm to another; what for some counts as freedom may for others be restriction. Yet behind this interpretive flexibility hides a fundamental confusion: the difficulty of making certain categories explicit is taken as proof that limits do not exist. This mistake leads to a radical relativism that ignores the role of reality as a structuring framework. Although concepts such as heat, love, or truth cannot always be defined with precise conceptual clarity, this does not mean that any interpretation is valid. There are objective boundaries which, beyond our disagreements, impose the category. The Postmodern Confusion The genealogy of this confusion ...

Introduction Ferdinand de Saussure revolutionized linguistics by proposing that the object of study is not given independently of analysis but is instead shaped by the observer’s framework. His analysis of the French word nu (‘naked’) illustrates this idea: depending on the perspective, the term may be perceived as a series of sounds, a conceptual expression, or a historical derivative of Latin. By highlighting how different fields within linguistics construct their own units of study, Saussure challenged the belief that language exists as an objective entity, separate from interpretation. However, he mistakenly confined this principle to linguistics, assuming that other sciences deal with pre-existing entities independent of the conceptual scheme. This supposition does not hold. Scientific theories, like linguistic analyses, are fundamentally shaped by their underlying premises. Modern philosophy of science, particularly through Kuhn’s paradigms, Feyerabend’s critiques and Kar...

Introduction Can translation ever fully capture the essence of a philosophical text? This question invites us to explore the challenges of transferring deep ideas across linguistic borders. Many readers rely on translations of classic works, often overlooking the intricate subtleties woven into the original language. These nuances, when lost or distorted in the adaptation, can lead to misinterpretations of complex arguments. This article contends that engaging directly with philosophical texts in their original form—or at least consulting bilingual editions—is crucial for preserving conceptual fidelity. Drawing on theories from linguistics and translation studies, the discussion illustrates how language shapes interpretation. By examining Friedrich Nietzsche’s §239 of Beyond Good and Evil as a case study, we highlight the potential pitfalls of interpretation, particularly regarding key terms such as “man” and “Herr”, which carry multiple layers of meaning in German. The analysi...