Return to Saussure

The Machine of Lagado, lithography. AI image “Methinks I hear some objector, demanding with an air of pleasantry and ridicule: ‘Is there no speaking then without all this trouble? Do we not talk every one of us, as well unlearned as learned; as well poor peasants, as profound philosophers?’” — George Berkeley, Alciphron, or The Minute Philosopher Introduction In the third part of Gulliver's Travels (1726), Jonathan Swift describes one of the strangest inventions in literary history. At the Academy of Lagado, Gulliver encounters a gigantic apparatus composed of wooden frames covered with words. Students turn handles, rearranging verbal combinations at random. The machine's inventor proudly claims that, with sufficient effort, anyone could produce books on philosophy, law, science, and politics without the inconvenience of study. The episode was intended as satire. Yet nearly three centuries later, readers find themselves in an unusual position. Machines now translate doc...

Language Names and Linguistic Systems In the chapter “Linguistics after Saussure” in The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics , Roy Harris draws attention to a persistent difficulty in the Saussurean conception of language. Linguistics claims to describe systems of signs, yet the entities to which such systems are usually attached—languages like “English,” “French,” or “Latin”—are not themselves clearly bounded objects. The everyday practice of naming languages sits uneasily beside the theoretical ambition to identify coherent linguistic systems. Harris formulates the problem in stark terms. The systems linguists analyze rarely align neatly with the language labels circulating in social life. As he observes: “The obvious difficulty (both for Saussure and for his successors) was that such systems do not unambiguously correspond to the commonly accepted language-names (such as ‘English’, ‘French’, ‘Latin’, etc.). So there is no guarantee that everything called, say, ‘En...

Detail from Die Schachspieler by Moritz Retzsch   Introduction Language has long fascinated philosophers and linguists alike. Ferdinand de Saussure and Ludwig Wittgenstein—working in different contexts—both challenged traditional notions of meaning, rejecting the idea that words merely function as names for things. Central to their respective critiques is the metaphor of the chess game, which each theorist employed to reframe how we think about meaning, value, and linguistic identity. As Roy Harris notes, both thinkers “dismiss the representational theory of language in favor of a rule-based model of meaning.”¹ Challenging Nomenclature: The Quest for Linguistic Identity This shared metaphor of chess emerges from a deeper critique both thinkers develop—a dissatisfaction with nomenclaturism—the belief that language operates primarily through a one-to-one correspondence between words and things.² Both thinkers viewed this as a misleading simplification that failed to account fo...