Return to Saussure

1. Introduction In Phaedo , Socrates’ enigmatic final words—“I owe the sacrifice of a rooster to Asklepios; will you pay that debt and not neglect to do so?”—have inspired profound philosophical inquiry. This seemingly simple statement encapsulates themes of life, death, and transcendence, leading to divergent interpretations. Gregory Nagy, in A Rooster for Asklepios: The Death and Life of Socrates , sees the reference to the god of healing as a testament to the resilience of life through the enduring power of dialogue, or logos . Friedrich Nietzsche, however, critiques this moment in Twilight of the Idols , interpreting it as evidence of Socrates’ ultimate disillusionment with life, declaring, “Even Socrates had had enough.” These contrasting interpretations frame the tension between two philosophical legacies: one celebrating renewal and continuity, the other exposing resignation and a rejection of vitality. This article explores how these perspectives reflect broader attitudes...

I. Introduction The purpose of this article is to define legal semiotics and highlight its relevance in understanding law as a system of signs and meanings. This field examines how legal texts, symbols, and rituals shape interpretation and communication within society. Furthermore, it draws heavily on the semiotic theories of Charles Sanders Peirce, whose innovative ideas provide a foundation for exploring the deeper connections between signs, meaning, and law. The structure of the article unfolds in several stages. First, it presents an overview of legal semiotics and its core principles. Next, it explains the relationship between legal semiotics and Peirce’s framework, emphasizing his triadic model of signification. This theoretical lens is then applied to legal contexts to illustrate how signs operate within judicial and societal frameworks. Finally, a practical case study is analyzed to demonstrate the application of legal semiotics in uncovering truth and shaping legal outcome...

  “Crito, I owe the sacrifice of a rooster to Asklepios; will you pay that debt and not neglect to do so?”  1. Introduction Nietzsche’s portrayal of Socrates and Plato in Twilight of the Idols significantly reduces their philosophical depth and multifaceted personalities to align with his critique of life-negating ideologies. In the section The Problem of Socrates , he identifies Socrates as a figure embodying decline, a “pseudo-Greek” whose approach, rooted in dialectics, reflects a hostility to life’s instincts. He extends this critique to Plato, portraying him as perpetuating this descent into rationalism and metaphysical abstraction. Nietzsche bolsters his argument with the concept of the “consensus sapientium,” claiming that the agreement among ancient sages about life’s negativity stems from their shared physiological malaise: That consensus sapientium—this I grasped better and better—demonstrates least of all that they were right about what they agreed on. Inste...

Abstract This article explores the intellectual interplay between Friedrich Nietzsche and Jacques Derrida, focusing on their critiques of Western metaphysics, culture, and education. Nietzsche's "hammer" metaphor and Derrida's deconstruction both seek to dismantle traditional values and intellectual idols, but their purposes diverge: Nietzsche aims to restore a golden age through cultural renewal, while Derrida rejects nostalgia, emphasizing the instability of meaning. The article examines Nietzsche's paradoxical admiration for Greek culture alongside his critique of Socrates, comparing it to Derrida's treatment of logocentrism. It concludes by addressing their differing visions for cultural and educational transformation. Introduction Friedrich Nietzsche and Jacques Derrida share a profound commitment to challenging the foundational principles of Western metaphysics, yet their objectives diverge significantly. Both thinkers focus on dismantling entre...

I. Introduction Twilight of the Idols serves as Nietzsche’s incisive critique of Western intellectual traditions, targeting entrenched values in philosophy, ethics, and culture. Described as a “philosophical polemic,” the book dismantles long-held ideals, questioning their validity and dynamism. Within this work, The Problem of Socrates occupies a central role, launching Nietzsche’s broader attack on rationalism and what he sees as life-denying tendencies inherent in Western thought. Socrates, primarily through Plato’s depiction, becomes the embodiment of these issues. Nietzsche portrays him as a symbol of decadence, a figure whose commitment to reason and dialectics suppresses instinct and vitality. This section, therefore, sets the tone for his challenge to conventional notions of truth, wisdom, and morality. In this article, we will delve into Nietzsche’s portrayal of the Greek thinker, comparing it with historical interpretations, including those of Plato, Xenophon, and others,...