Return to Saussure

The Algorithmic Gaze. AI image   Introduction “Man is the measure of all things.” The phrase, attributed to Protagoras, is often taken as a simple statement of relativism. Yet its scope is wider. It marks a point of departure: a world in which reality cannot be separated from the standpoint of the one who encounters it. What is, appears always for someone. From this starting point, a long transformation unfolds. Across centuries, the locus of measure does not remain fixed. It is challenged, displaced, and reformulated in different ways. What begins as a claim about perception becomes, over time, a question about the ground of knowledge itself. Seen from the present, this trajectory takes on a new shape. From ancient philosophy to contemporary systems of calculation, the issue is no longer how the world is measured, but whether man still occupies that position as the measure of reality. Protagoras and the Human Measure Protagoras’s claim does more than register disagreemen...

Introduction For several centuries, Western thought rested on a seemingly stable conviction: that human experience is the ultimate source of meaning and authority. To know the world was, in the last instance, to return to oneself—to perception, reflection, or judgment. Whether in philosophy, politics, or ethics, the subject functioned as the final point of reference. Today, this assumption no longer holds with the same force. Decisions once grounded in intuition are increasingly delegated to systems that register, process, and anticipate behavior. What appears at first as a technical development points toward something more fundamental. The question is no longer simply how we know, but who—or what—counts as a knower. Humanism and the Authority of the Subject Modern humanism emerged from a decisive reorientation. With René Descartes, certainty was no longer anchored in tradition or external authority, but in the immediacy of thought itself. The cogito did more than establish a f...

Freud and Baudrillard Rewritten. AI art Introduction Ideas, once conceived within the disciplined confines of theory, often take on a life of their own when released into culture. They can inspire, provoke, and mesmerize, yet in the process they risk distortion. This paradox is evident in the relationship between Sigmund Freud and Surrealism, and between Jean Baudrillard and the film The Matrix. Both cases show how radical thought can be aesthetically harnessed while losing fidelity to its conceptual rigor. Art and film may captivate, yet their appropriation of theory exposes both the potency and fragility of ideas once they escape the originator’s mind. Freud and the Surrealist Unconscious Freud’s psychoanalytic theory reshaped the understanding of the mind, bringing into view an unconscious structured by desire, repression, and symbolic processes. Surrealists seized upon this vision, seeking to unlock the creative force beneath rational control. Through automatic writing, dream...

Welcome to the desert of the real. AI art Introduction Modern thought dismantled the image of a unified, self-transparent subject once anchored in the philosophy of René Descartes. Over the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, this figure—certain of itself and fully present to its own thinking—was fractured, displaced, rendered opaque. Yet the disappearance of this model did not dissolve the desire for certainty. It relocated it. In a culture organized around data extraction, predictive modeling, and artificial intelligence, a new ambition takes shape: to render everything visible, knowable, calculable. A paradox emerges. At the very moment the subject loses access to itself, systems arise that convert this opacity into a resource—something to be tracked, modeled, and acted upon. What appears as a shift in how we know may signal something more decisive: a transformation in the relation between knowledge, reality, and experience. The End of Self-Transparency The critique o...