Return to Saussure

1. What Does a Judgement Leave Out? 'This rose is red.' The statement seems straightforward. Yet what does it tell us about the rose? The concept 'red' identifies a property of the flower, but this particular rose has a shape, scent and texture, occupies a specific place and has a history of growth. The predicate expresses one of its characteristics without expressing everything that makes it the particular object it is. Ordinary descriptions, of course, are not normally intended to provide exhaustive accounts of their objects. The philosophical question arises when we examine the logical relationship between the subject and its predicate : what exactly do we assert when we say that something is something? Does the concept through which we identify an object adequately express what that object is? Hegel investigates this problem through the structure of judgement. Adorno takes up the underlying tension and develops it into a broader critique of what he calls i...

1. The Fantasy of a New Beginning Can philosophical thought begin from zero? The ambition is familiar: to free inquiry from inherited assumptions, challenge the authority of established systems and claim a starting point that belongs entirely to the thinker. Such a project seems to promise intellectual independence. To make a genuinely original contribution, it may appear necessary to release our ideas from the concepts and arguments through which earlier generations understood the world. Yet the attempt to make this break encounters a difficulty as soon as it is put into practice. A thinker who rejects an established philosophy must identify what is being rejected, formulate objections and propose alternatives. Each of these activities depends on a language and a conceptual vocabulary already shaped by earlier uses. Even the call for a new beginning relies on inherited meanings of such terms as reason, freedom, truth and experience. The past therefore remains active within the ver...

I am that gadfly which God has attached to the state, and all day long and in all places am always fastening upon you, arousing and persuading and reproaching you. — Plato, Apology , 30e–31a, trans. Benjamin Jowett 1. When Knowledge Becomes Settled A scientific investigation produces findings that later researchers take up and incorporate into their own work. A concept, classification, or explanation proves useful, gains acceptance within a discipline, and gradually becomes part of its established knowledge. Its validity may rest on careful observation, rigorous methods, and repeated confirmation. As a finding becomes familiar, however, the questions surrounding its emergence can recede from view. The assumptions that made it possible, the problems to which it responded, and the circumstances in which it acquired its meaning may receive less attention than the result itself. This consolidation is an ordinary feature of intellectual work. Research would make little progress if e...

Constellations. AI image 1. The Patterns We See On a clear night, we can look at the stars and recognise patterns among points of light scattered across the sky. By imagining lines connecting them, we form figures that would otherwise remain unnoticed. Different arrangements produce different patterns, even though the stars themselves remain unchanged. This familiar experience raises a philosophical question: are the relationships we recognise already present in the elements, waiting to be discovered, or do they emerge through the ways in which we bring those elements together? Hilary Lawson and Theodor W. Adorno both draw on this astronomical imagery to explore how configurations become intelligible. Although they address different philosophical problems, their approaches invite us to consider how the relationships established among elements shape the ways in which we experience and understand the world. 2. Lawson: Closure and the Constitution of Reality In Closure: A Story of...