The Supplementarity of Immutability and Mutability in Linguistic Signs


Introduction

Ferdinand de Saussure made significant contributions to the study of linguistics, semiotics, and the nature of linguistic signs. This blog post delves into Saussure's concepts of immutability and mutability in linguistic signs and explores how the linguist's perspective influences the perception of this dichotomy.

Immutability

In the Cours, Saussure delves into the concept of immutability within linguistic signs. He emphasizes that while the choice of the signifier/signifiant might appear free concerning the signified/signifié, it is not arbitrary within the linguistic community. The community imposes the choice of the signifier, and it cannot be arbitrarily replaced by another, a phenomenon known as "forced choice/choix imposé".

Saussure argues that language, inherited from previous generations, is not a mere contractual agreement but a societal convention. The concept of the arbitrary nature of the sign suggests that this could have been different, but societies have always received language as an inheritance without the possibility of substantial alterations.

Several arguments underpin the immutability of language:

  1. Arbitrariness of the sign: Linguistic signs are arbitrary, lacking a rational basis for questioning or changing them.
  2. Multitude of necessary signs: A language consists of countless signs, making it impractical to replace them all.
  3. Complexity of the system: Language is a complex system, understood fully only through reflection.
  4. Collective inertia: Language is deeply ingrained in society and resistant to change due to constant use by everyone.

Partial conclusion: Saussure posits that the immutability of linguistic signs arises from their arbitrary nature, the sheer number of signs, the complexity of the system, and the collective inertia of society. Historical tradition and the connection to the past also contribute to this immutability, making linguistic signs resistant to change.

Mutability

Next, Saussure explores the concept of mutability within linguistic signs and how time plays a role in altering them while maintaining their continuity. He underscores the interplay between the notions of immutability and mutability, with linguistic signs being subject to change because they endure over time.

The primary driver of alteration in linguistic signs is the persistence of the old material. Even when changes occur, they are relative, and the connection to the past remains. This is why the principle of alteration is founded on the principle of continuity.

Saussure asserts that language is fundamentally powerless to resist factors that continually alter the relationship between the signified and the signifier over time due to the arbitrariness of the sign. Unlike other human institutions, which are constrained by natural relationships between means and ends, language can associate any idea with any sequence of sounds.

Furthermore, Saussure notes that language evolves under the influence of various agents affecting both sounds and meanings. This evolution is inevitable, with no examples of languages that have successfully resisted change. Even constructed languages like Esperanto are not immune to this natural law.

Partial conclusion: the continuity of the sign over time, coupled with its alteration, is a fundamental principle of general linguistics. While the causes of continuity are more apparent, the causes of alteration are complex and varied. Nonetheless, the interaction of social forces and time ensures that linguistic signs will continuously evolve, with shifts in the relationship between signified and signifier being a natural consequence of this process.

Interconnectedness of Immutability and Mutability of Linguistic Signs

Just as quantum particles exhibit wave-like or particle-like behavior depending on observation, the perception of the linguistic sign's immutability or mutability hinges on the chosen perspective. Saussure emphasizes that the linguistic sign appears immutable because of historical factors, the arbitrary nature of signs, and the complexity of the language system. Yet, when viewed from the lens of mutability, linguistic signs evolve over time, altering the relationship between signifier and signified.

Conclusion

Saussure's linguistic theory embodies the maxim "c'est le point de vue qui crée l'objet," resonating deeply within the field. This concept mirrors the interconnectedness of dichotomies, akin to the Observer Effect in quantum mechanics. Through Saussure's exploration of the sign's immutability and mutability, a profound realization emerges: these facets are intricately intertwined components of language. The state of the linguistic sign, whether perceived as immutable or mutable, is contingent upon the adopted perspective, highlighting the rich and complex nature of language as a subject of study. Just as in the quantum realm where observation influences behavior, in linguistics, the observer's viewpoint serves as a linchpin in defining the essence of language.

We're thrilled to have you reading our blogs! We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions, or any cool insights you might have about the fascinating world where linguistics and philosophy collide. Don't be shy – drop us a line and let's have a chat! Together, we'll dive into the exciting mysteries of linguistics and philosophy and build a friendly and engaging community of thinkers. 😊

Riddle Me This:

Comprehension Question 1: What are the key factors that Ferdinand de Saussure identifies to explain the immutability of linguistic signs, and how do they contribute to the stability of language?

·         Answer: Ferdinand de Saussure identifies several key factors contributing to the immutability of linguistic signs, including the arbitrary nature of signs, the large number of signs, the complexity of the linguistic system, and the collective inertia of society. These factors collectively make it difficult for linguistic signs to change significantly, ensuring the stability of language.

Comprehension Question 2: How does Saussure explain the interconnectedness of immutability and mutability in linguistic signs, and what role does the observer's perspective play in shaping our understanding of this dichotomy?

·         Answer: Saussure explains that the perception of immutability or mutability in linguistic signs depends on the observer's perspective. He emphasizes that linguistic signs can appear immutable due to historical factors and the arbitrary nature of signs, but they also evolve over time, altering the relationship between signifier and signified. The observer's point of view influences how they perceive this dichotomy, highlighting the interconnectedness of these facets and underscoring the role of perspective in defining the nature of linguistic signs.

Bibliography

These issues are addressed in the blog posts:

·         The Unquestionable Reality of the Observer Effect in Quantum Mechanics

·         Bridging Quantum Mechanics and Linguistics: The Observer Effect

·         Two Aspects of "The Object of Study": Internal and External Linguistics

·         The Whole is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Conversation with Saussure

Image
  A Conversation with Le Maître Student : I arrived in Geneva last night from France, taking the 8.45 train from Paris. I was eager to meet you because I stumbled upon a book that references your teachings. I'd like to read a passage from it and hear your thoughts: "In the eyes of Saussure, writing is a garb of perversion and debauchery, a cloak of corruption and disguise, a masquerade that must be exorcised – in other words, fended off – by the virtuous word: 'Writing veils the appearance of language; it is not a guise for language but a disguise'. A peculiar 'image.' One might already suspect that if writing is an 'image' and an external 'figuration,' this 'representation' is not without its implications. The exterior and interior share a relationship that is, as usual, anything but mere externalization." What's your perspective on this? Saussure : Before I dive into the topic, I'd like to acknowledge that the pass...
Read more

Historia and Différance: The Interplay of Narrative and Deconstruction

Image
Objective: To examine the philosophical and narrative parallels between Herodotus and Derrida, highlighting how Herodotus’ innovative treatment of history, origins, and storytelling elucidates key dimensions of Derrida’s deconstructive philosophy. This article argues that the ancient historian offers a tangible and accessible entry point into Derrida’s complex ideas, including his critique of metaphysics, the concept of différance, and the portrayal of history as fragmented, fluid, and nonlinear. Introduction Herodotus, the "father of history," as he is often called, occupies a singular place in intellectual tradition by blending narrative exploration with philosophical inquiry. Similarly, Jacques Derrida revolutionized contemporary thought through his challenges to established notions of origins, meaning, and causality. This article explores the relationship between these two figures, analyzing how the former’s fluid approach to beginnings, storytelling, and causati...
Read more

“There Is Nothing Outside”: A Parallel Between Nietzsche and Derrida’s Radical Critiques of Metaphysics

Image
Abstract This article explores the philosophical convergence between Nietzsche’s “there is nothing outside the whole” ( es gibt nichts außer dem Ganzen ) in Twilight of the Idols and Derrida’s “there is nothing outside the text” ( il n’y a pas de hors-texte ) in Of Grammatology . Both statements dismantle metaphysical frameworks by rejecting external origins or absolute truths and affirming systems as self-referential and interwoven. Nietzsche challenges the notion of divine or teleological causation, while Derrida critiques the idea of an independent "transcendental signified." By providing the intellectual background of these declarations and analyzing their shared themes, the article illuminates their joint significance in destabilizing Western philosophical traditions and revealing the immanent, dynamic nature of existence and meaning. Introduction The lines “there is nothing outside the whole” and “there is nothing outside the text” are cornerstones of Niet...
Read more