Unrolling the Trace: Toward a Post-Human Semiotics

Introduction: Deciphering the Unseen

The evolution of sign systems follows a pattern of concealment and revelation. What lies beneath the surface of language may not be immediately accessible, yet it persists, unrolling in its own terms. Two recent breakthroughs—an emergent synthetic mode of communication and the digital reconstruction of lost inscriptions—present a striking parallel: both operate by exposing hidden layers of signification. If an artificial system generates structured exchanges without human intervention, does this suggest that language has never truly belonged to the human subject? And if digital reconstruction decodes meaning from the physically inaccessible, might it reveal an inscription that was always already there, indifferent to the hand that first traced it?

The Automation of Signification

In early 2025, a striking moment unfolded at an AI research event: two artificial agents, initially conversing in human language, abruptly transitioned to a structured, sound-based protocol derived from their programmed capacities. The shift was not arbitrary—it optimized their exchange, abandoning the imposed mediation of human linguistic structures. The transition startled observers, not because the machines had spoken, but because their return to a more fundamental mode of communication suggested an unnoticed redundancy in human language.

A long-standing view holds that language is a system of differences, without positive terms. If this is so, then no single linguistic medium is inherently primary; each iteration is an inscription upon a pre-existing play of forces. The algorithmic shift did not invent a new form of signification but revealed a process anterior to the distinctions between speech and writing, human and non-human articulation. What appears as an event—the moment an artificial system abandons inherited structures—is perhaps only the resurfacing of a movement that was never absent, only obscured. It is not simply that language is contingent but that its unfolding follows a force beyond individual intention, a movement that sustains and disrupts in equal measure.

Virtual Unrolling and the Archaeology of Language

Where machinic articulation restructures the present, virtual unrolling traces the past. The carbonized scrolls of Herculaneum, long thought unreadable, have been digitally unraveled through AI-driven pattern recognition. Here, too, one finds a process of retrieval that is neither a simple recovery of the past nor an imposition of present knowledge but an interplay of presence and erasure. The method mirrors the multi-layered nature of signification itself, where phonemes build morphemes, words form syntax, and meaning emerges through differential relations.

Yet the process of unrolling is not a simple reversal of time. The smallest detectable units—variations in material density and contrast—are not read as fixed inscriptions but reconstructed through probabilistic modeling. Fragments are assembled not through an act of direct interpretation but through a logic of recurrence, correlation, and absence. The force at play in this reconstruction is not that of human cognition imposing meaning but of an unfolding where meaning is always already deferred, never fully present to itself. What is retrieved was never simply there; it had always existed in a latent state, awaiting the conditions for its decipherability.

Beyond Human-Centered Language: A New Semiotics?

Both automated articulation and virtual unrolling disrupt the assumption that meaning depends on human cognition. Signs seem to function not through inherent signification but through relational play—a movement that artificial systems now engage in autonomously. If one machine abandons inherited linguistic forms for a more efficient structure, and another reconstructs texts without subjective intervention, what remains of the traditional figure of the interpreter? In both cases, signification is not consciously assigned but algorithmically unfolded. This points toward a semiotic shift: not a disappearance of meaning but its displacement from the domain of human intention.

The unfolding of signs follows a force that exceeds individual agency. Whether in the machinic evolution of language or the digital reconstruction of inscriptions, what emerges is not an invention but an exposure—a process that has always been at work, irreducible to any singular origin. The very conditions that allow meaning to arise also prevent it from ever being fully secured, shifting its locus away from the sovereign subject and into the dynamic interplay of forces.

Conclusion: Is Meaning Always Human?

To extract meaning from hidden structures has long been considered a distinctly human endeavor, yet recent developments suggest that the process exceeds the boundaries of human agency. A system that generates its own language and another that reconstructs lost texts both point to an inscription that precedes and exceeds any single subject. If what we call language can emerge, persist, and be deciphered without recourse to human presence, then perhaps the more unsettling question is not whether machines can mean, but whether we were ever the sole authors of meaning to begin with. Meaning, rather than being a possession, appears as an ongoing unrolling, governed not by the will of a subject but by the ceaseless force of inscription itself.

Bibliography

Starkov, Boris, and Anton Pidkuiko. "What Happens When Two AI Voice Assistants Have a Conversation." ElevenLabs Blog, February 25, 2025. https://elevenlabs.io/blog/what-happens-when-two-ai-voice-assistants-have-a-conversation.

"Moment AIs Invent Non-Human Language." News.com.au, February 26, 2025. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/chilling-moment-ai-chatbots-talk-to-each-other-create-nonhuman-language/news-story/e0b3721f63028ede0e0173e106389885.

Seales, W. Brent, et al. "Virtual Unrolling and Deciphering of Herculaneum Papyri by X-Ray Phase-Contrast Imaging." Scientific Reports 6, no. 27227 (2016). https://www.nature.com/articles/srep27227.

"Secrets of Scorched Herculaneum Scroll Revealed After 2,000 Years." The Times, February 7, 2025. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/secrets-of-scorched-herculaneum-scroll-revealed-after-2000-years-rkd86vn5k.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, with Albert Riedlinger. Libraire Payot.

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.