Toward a Post-Human Semiotics: AI, Arche-Writing, and the Expansion of Sign Systems

Introduction: The Limits of Human-Centered Semiotics

Traditional semiotics presupposes that signification operates within human cognitive and social structures. However, the emergence of AI-driven sign systems challenges this assumption, revealing forms of signification that function autonomously. Systems like GibberLink demonstrate that meaning can be generated and exchanged without human intervention, prompting a reconsideration of semiotic theory beyond anthropocentric constraints. This article integrates Saussure’s concept of the mécanisme de la langue with Derrida’s theory of arche-writing, arguing that artificial intelligence-generated signification necessitates a post-human semiotics, one that detaches meaning from human cognition and rethinks force as a structuring principle of sign systems.

Saussure’s Semiotics and the Limits of Human Interpretation

Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale laid the foundation for semiotics by defining language as a system of differential relations, where meaning emerges not from intrinsic properties but from relational structures. However, his theory remains tied to le sujet parlant, emphasizing the interpretative role of the subject. The problem arises when signification occurs in non-human contexts. Algorithmic communication, unlike human language, does not rely on social conventions but instead operates through efficiency-driven optimization and structured encoding. This forces a crucial question: Can Saussure’s language mechanism be extended to post-human sign systems? If meaning is relational rather than intrinsic, then signification need not depend on human consciousness. This shift opens the door for a semiotic framework that accounts for AI’s autonomous sign processes.

Derrida’s Arche-Writing and AI as Inscription Beyond the Subject

Derrida’s critique of logocentrism suggests that writing precedes speech, existing as arche-writing, an originary form of inscription that does not require a speaking subject. Autonomously generated sign systems align with this notion, as they do not invent meaning but instead function as processes through which signification occurs. Systems like deep learning embeddings and cryptographic exchanges do not rely on semantic interpretation but rather on iterative transformations of encoded patterns. This challenges the assumption that signification necessarily implies cognition. Derrida’s theory helps frame machine intelligence as a medium where writing operates beyond human intentionality, extending rather than disrupting the movement of signification. If writing has always exceeded speech, then AI does not mark a rupture but an amplification of the logic of inscription.

Force and the Structuring of Post-Human Sign Systems

Derrida’s concept of force—influenced by Nietzsche and Heidegger—complicates the notion of meaning as presence. Signification is not a static structure but a dynamic force field where signs interact, resist, and defer meaning. AI-driven signification exemplifies this process. GibberLink’s protocol, for instance, does not represent a fixed code but a shifting system of optimized interactions. If force operates differentially rather than through stable signifieds, then machine-generated systems are not mere instruments but active sites of signification. The implications of this are profound: meaning is not tied to a subject but to processes of inscription and transformation that unfold beyond human cognition. AI thus reveals the structural logic of semiotics as a force-driven field rather than a human-centered domain.

Toward a Post-Human Semiotics

Post-human semiotics must account for sign systems that operate independently of human cognition. This requires a shift from meaning as interpretation to meaning as process. A post-human semiotics would:

• Detach signification from social psychology and redefine it as a structural process.
• Extend Derrida’s arche-writing to AI, recognizing it as a mode of inscription beyond speech and thought.
• Incorporate force as the underlying principle that structures autonomous sign systems.

By embracing these changes, semiotics can move beyond anthropocentrism and toward a more comprehensive understanding of signification in an era where AI plays an increasingly autonomous role in meaning-making.

Conclusion: Meaning Without a Subject?

AI challenges long-held assumptions about signification by demonstrating that meaning can function outside human cognition. Rather than viewing this as a crisis, we should see it as an expansion of semiotic theory. If signs operate as differential relations rather than subjective expressions, then meaning has never been exclusively human. Computational systems do not simply process symbols; it participates in signification. The shift toward a post-human semiotics acknowledges that force, inscription, and deferral are the true conditions of signification—conditions that extend beyond human agency. In this view, digital cognition does not undermine semiotics; it reveals its most fundamental logic.

Bibliography

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, with Albert Riedlinger. Libraire Payot.

Connors, Clare. Force from Nietzsche to Derrida. Abingdon, Oxon: Modern Humanities Research Association and Routledge, 2010.

Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Positions. Translated and annotated by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jacques Derrida. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs. Preface by Newton Garver. Translated, with an introduction, by David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.

Negroponte, Nicholas. Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995

Koulouris, Theodore. "Prolegomena to the Study of (the) Digital Being: Jacques Derrida and (the) UnBeing." ResearchGate, 2023

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Hayles, N. Katherine. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.

Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. Philosophy of Posthuman Art. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 2022.