Linguistics and Philosophy of Mind


 Introduction

In recent decades, philosophy has advanced significantly through interdisciplinary contributions from psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, ethology, and evolutionary theory, shedding light on the complexities of the mind. Despite this progress, the field continues to grapple with ambiguities, particularly in defining the nature of consciousness and choosing between alternative theories of mind.

The Semantic and Epistemological Problems

The semantic problem within the mind-body debate centers on the origin and meaning of everyday terms for mental states like "love" or "happiness." One view suggests these derive their meanings from subjective experiences, where individuals associate terms with their own inner sensations. However, this approach faces challenges in verifying whether others' experiences of "love" are qualitatively similar to our own.

An alternative theory posits that mental state terms gain meaning through causal relationships. For instance, "love" might be understood as a state triggered by seeing another person, leading to observable behaviors such as smiling, blushing, or elation.

The semantic problem leads to the epistemological problem, which is complex in the mind-body debate, consisting of two perplexing parts.

Firstly, it addresses the justification for believing that others have mental states akin to our own. While we typically assume shared experiences of mental states, the rational basis for this assumption remains unclear. Justifying it would necessitate demonstrating that others' behaviors stem causally from inner states similar to ours , implying the requirement for direct subjective experience of another's mental states—a challenge famously known as the problem of other minds. This challenge extends to animals and advanced computer technology, prompting inquiries into distinguishing conscious intelligence from sophisticated behavioral simulations.

In contrast, one's mental states are described as "transparent" through introspection, allowing for direct self-conscious access without reliance on external behaviors. This capacity to directly apprehend one's feelings, thoughts, and desires is considered by some as infallible and a defining characteristic of the mind, thereby posing a challenge for materialists. Consequently, the nature of the mind encompasses both philosophical and scientific dimensions, and the resolution of these issues is likely to be significantly influenced by the theoretical framework adopted.

The Methodological Problem

Constructing a "science of the mind" raises methodological debates akin to those faced by Saussure in linguistics:

 "What is it that linguistics sets out to analyse? What is the actual object of study in its entirety? The question is a particularly difficult one. Other sciences are provided with objects of study given in advance, which are then examined from different points of view. Nothing like that is the case in linguistics.

The object is not given in advance of the viewpoint: far from it. Rather, one might say that it is the viewpoint adopted which creates the object. Furthermore, there is nothing to tell us in advance whether one of these ways of looking at it is prior to or superior to any of the others." [CGL] [23]

Should the science of mind align with established natural sciences or maintain autonomy due to consciousness's unique features? Methodological choices—such as prioritizing introspective reports, observable behavior, or neurophysiological data—profoundly shape research into conscious intelligence.

Saussure's struggle to define the object of study in linguistics mirrors philosophers of mind grappling with defining and understanding mental states. Linguistics lacks predefined objects of study. For example, the French word "nu," can be viewed as a sound, an idea, or a derivative of Latin depending on the perspective taken by the linguist. Similarly, mental states in philosophy of mind are multifaceted, involving both subjective experiences and observable behaviors, challenging efforts to isolate a singular approach.

Saussure's focus on linguistic structure (la langue) suggests a potential solution: prioritizing a central concern—in this case, the nature of consciousness—and relating all manifestations of mind to it. This approach could provide clarity amidst the dualities inherent in both fields, distinguishing philosophy of mind from related disciplines.

Conclusion

The difficulty in defining the object of study and the significance of chosen perspectives resonate deeply in both linguistics and the philosophy of mind. By drawing parallels, we highlight the importance of methodological coherence and theoretical clarity in advancing our understanding of consciousness. Saussure's emphasis on la langue as a principle of classification offers a guiding tenet for philosophers of mind to navigate the complexities of mental phenomena and establish a coherent framework for future inquiry.

One solution only, in our view, resolves all these difficulties. The linguist must take the study of linguistic structure as his primary concern, and relate all other manifestations of language to it. Indeed, amid so many dualities, linguistic structure seems to be the one thing that is independently definable and provides something our minds can satisfactorily grasp. [CGL] [25]

Cite this page: "Return to Saussure." http://www.derridaforlinguists.blogspot.com

Related Post

Reality, Language and Thought: Exploring the Ontological, Semantic, and Epistemological Problems in Philosophy of Mind

https://derridaforlinguists.blogspot.com/2024/07/blog-post_08.html

The Protean Nature of Language: An Elusive Quest for Unity

https://derridaforlinguists.blogspot.com/2024/03/blog-post_23.html

Bibliography

Gáliková, Silvia, ed. Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cognitive Studies Edition. Kraków: Towarzystwo Słowaków w Polsce; Filozofická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave, 2013.

Crawford, Sean, ed. General Introduction to Philosophy of Mind. Critical Concepts of Philosophy, 4 vols. London: Routledge, 2011.

Feser, Edward. Philosophy of Mind: A Short Introduction. First South Asian Edition. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2006.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Conversation with Saussure

Image
  A Conversation with Le Maître Student : I arrived in Geneva last night from France, taking the 8.45 train from Paris. I was eager to meet you because I stumbled upon a book that references your teachings. I'd like to read a passage from it and hear your thoughts: "In the eyes of Saussure, writing is a garb of perversion and debauchery, a cloak of corruption and disguise, a masquerade that must be exorcised – in other words, fended off – by the virtuous word: 'Writing veils the appearance of language; it is not a guise for language but a disguise'. A peculiar 'image.' One might already suspect that if writing is an 'image' and an external 'figuration,' this 'representation' is not without its implications. The exterior and interior share a relationship that is, as usual, anything but mere externalization." What's your perspective on this? Saussure : Before I dive into the topic, I'd like to acknowledge that the pass...
Read more

Historia and Différance: The Interplay of Narrative and Deconstruction

Image
Objective: To examine the philosophical and narrative parallels between Herodotus and Derrida, highlighting how Herodotus’ innovative treatment of history, origins, and storytelling elucidates key dimensions of Derrida’s deconstructive philosophy. This article argues that the ancient historian offers a tangible and accessible entry point into Derrida’s complex ideas, including his critique of metaphysics, the concept of différance, and the portrayal of history as fragmented, fluid, and nonlinear. Introduction Herodotus, the "father of history," as he is often called, occupies a singular place in intellectual tradition by blending narrative exploration with philosophical inquiry. Similarly, Jacques Derrida revolutionized contemporary thought through his challenges to established notions of origins, meaning, and causality. This article explores the relationship between these two figures, analyzing how the former’s fluid approach to beginnings, storytelling, and causati...
Read more

“There Is Nothing Outside”: A Parallel Between Nietzsche and Derrida’s Radical Critiques of Metaphysics

Image
Abstract This article explores the philosophical convergence between Nietzsche’s “there is nothing outside the whole” ( es gibt nichts außer dem Ganzen ) in Twilight of the Idols and Derrida’s “there is nothing outside the text” ( il n’y a pas de hors-texte ) in Of Grammatology . Both statements dismantle metaphysical frameworks by rejecting external origins or absolute truths and affirming systems as self-referential and interwoven. Nietzsche challenges the notion of divine or teleological causation, while Derrida critiques the idea of an independent "transcendental signified." By providing the intellectual background of these declarations and analyzing their shared themes, the article illuminates their joint significance in destabilizing Western philosophical traditions and revealing the immanent, dynamic nature of existence and meaning. Introduction The lines “there is nothing outside the whole” and “there is nothing outside the text” are cornerstones of Niet...
Read more